(Wait for the graph.)
I knew my normal approach could work for this.
I love this latest xkcd cartoon:

I attempted to make a maths joke last night, but it did not go down well. Plus, it was so bad that I can’t even remember what it was. Oh xkcd, why can’t I be more like you?
Phillip Ball on how people have a natural tendency to treat numbers logarithmically, and why this is useful:
it is our own intuitive sense of number that is somehow awry. The notion of a decreasing distance between numbers makes perfect sense once we think about that difference in proportionate terms: 1,001 is clearly more akin to 1,000 than 2 is to 1. We can even quantify those degrees of likeness. If we space numbers along a scale such that the distances between them reflect the proportion by which they increment the previous number, then the distance of a number n from 1 is given by the harmonic series, the sum of 1 + 1/2 + 1/3 + 1/4 and so on up to 1/n. This distance is roughly proportional to the logarithm of n.
This, it is often said, is why life seems to speed up as we get older: each passing year is a smaller proportion of our whole life. In perceptual terms, the clock ticks with an ever faster beat.
Link via 3quarksdaily
Copyright © richardholden.net
A blog about science and words.
Built on Notes Blog Core
Powered by WordPress